User:Ldsfr1p4t5

s wife ten years ago was a divorce lawyer refers to the cour
'm such a conclusion on this case, and in the future who's there to protect marriage "Marital relations because of that done, a rich list Hurun Rich List's wife Ms. Song Haidian court to sue her husband for divorce. Husband actually took out a piece of paper the decision two years ago proved long ago divorced, and Ms. Song claiming this totally unaware. Exclusive interview with this reporter,?mod=space&uid=30088, the wife of billionaire inquiry "is divorce" mystery. I discovered has been sued for divorce "divorce" decade despite being a billionaire's wife, but in addition to this capacity Ms. Song's closest people, few people know that she do not want anybody to know. In Ms. Song seems that this identity did not bring her much enjoyment, but is suffering unspeakable. After 22 years of maintaining a marriage, Ms. Song choose divorce. Last September, Ms. Song's divorce case in Beijing Haidian court pretrial mediation. Identity illustrious husband did not show up, his attorney raised objections to the jurisdiction that the case should be tried in local courts in Hebei. Ms. Song did not think so anyway, in addition to raise objections to the jurisdiction of the other party has come up with a verdict in force, Hengshui City, Hebei Province Intermediate People's Court made in 2001, was shocked to read the court judgment has been ruling the divorce, the couple Two real estate owned housing units in a woman's all. That is to say, a decade ago, the couple had to end the marriage, while Miss Song actually completely unaware of this, but also on the court yet. "I was on the Mongolia, mind blank. "Miss Song told reporters that she could not believe such a big thing for divorce, how she did not know. Reporters saw in the verdict, Ms. Song's husband, said he outside year round business, busy little home. It is inevitable that misunderstandings between husband and wife, waned. Ms. Song said he "was a divorce" because she did not appear in court, a copy of the indictment and court summons, and even judgments are served by public announcement, from beginning to end, even the shadow children she did not know. Of Civil Procedure provides that missing person to be served, or otherwise required by law can not be served before the announcement served. After the public notice should be exhausted other mode of service, a way to protect the right to appeal the final adoption of the parties. Did Ms. Song disappeared in 2001 "Unaccounted for" stricken "by the divorce," according to Ms. Song's husband to court to say, after he separated from his wife in 1997, three and a half years, the phone did not even contacted his wife during this period "drop unknown. " But reporters at the Miss Song's lawyer and obtained a divorce case file and did not see the call or send the relevant court records of judicial notice designed to send material to be returned by mail. The court found Ms. Song "unaccounted for," the evidence is a visit to the investigation. February 5, 2001, the judge made a special trip to Beijing to residential Miss Song live, find a staff member of the property management office, according to the staff member said Ms. Song has not lived here more than a year, and find people. Ms. Song afterwards found the property staff to understand the situation, the person said on condition of residence at the time of Ms. Song did not know. February 9, 2001, the court served notice of the complaint and a court summons newspapers. Miss Song is almost no chance to see the newspaper notice, of course, did not appear in court. After the expiry of the notice, the court default judgment in court that day, and also served on the verdict announcement, after the expiration of the commencement of the divorce decree so. Ms. Song puzzled and said: "My phone number since 1997 began to use, has not replaced, if my phone can not play not contact me. The address of the court is also investigating the residence I was even up knocked on the door, I could at home. And my identity card for permanent address is the residence of her in-laws, I often go back, can also find me. While I was separated from her husband, but after all, two people have children, but also in regular contact, he said I unaccounted no problem, can the court alone to find a property called people say that I am missing, it can not be justified. "" Flawed "frequent closer look at this verdict divorce decree, Miss Song is angry. The verdict on the seriousness actually had a lot of "flawed." First, her name in one word wrong, her husband's birth date was wrong after a year,%22, the eldest son's date of birth is wrong. But can not explain that, Miss Song's second son in 2007 the name was changed, and the 2001 verdict had been using the new name after six years of it. Ms. Song leaving confused,Classic Black Louboutin Pumps, she was divorced in unknowingly, may be this decade never talk about her husband Why Even more strange is that, in the past two years, the two had agreed to a divorce also discuss matters. Husband, also a lawyer drafted a divorce agreement. In addition, the handle of her husband in 2009, Hebei temporary residence permits,?mod=space&uid=39126, marital status is still "married." Since he already got a divorce judgment,why do so many "hidden", even after the divorce and Ms. Song also discuss divorce agreement Although she has too many problems, but did not go to Ms. Song asked her husband. "My heart is all broken. "Ms. Song said she would rather go bankrupt also put this lawsuit in the end, the identity of a say to myself this decade. "I want to fight for the rights of the child" Since Ms. Song also want a divorce, but then also found the divorce judgment. From the results point of view is no different, Miss Song why not accept it "There should not divorce from my comments,peuterey sito ufficiale, I can not accept it without the knowledge of being divorced. "Miss Song said, the more important point is that in the 2001 decision, the husband's duties also wrote the manager of a pipe factory, but after all these years, his assets have surged know how many times. If the two had been divorced 10 years ago, that this decade husband's assets on all of their personal property; If overturned this verdict, then these assets should be jointly owned property. Once split up, this will be the highest amount of domestic assets underlying divorce case. Such astronomical property, Ms. Song could not be tempted. But she told reporters that her own power could live very well,Louboutin Classic Black, this wealth is sure to give her two sons fought. Ms. Song and her husband are from Beijing, the original work in a factory, in 1988 to get married. Two free love, very happy married life, has given birth to two boys. Husband is very business-minded, with his wife venture into the sea, from scratch, run from the pipe plant. For children, Ms. Song home to start a full-time wife. Ms. Song said that in expecting her second child, the two sides produced intense conflict, separated lives. "I gave birth to two sons six months after the hands of money, had to go to work. He took the opportunity to send their children taken away. "Miss Song comes to child sad lap dog eat dog. Ms. Song said that in this decade, she worked hard teeth entrepreneurship, and finally a small achievement, the company also has a good income each year. "My two children are our normal married fertility, if I do not seek to address in the future they will certainly be in trouble. "Ms. Song said that if she could win a couple of their own part of the common property division, will leave all the two children. The woman's desire to fight the lawsuit invalid divorce, Ms. Song Longan Law Firm in Beijing attracted find the main Ren Chenxu counsel. Although Chen Xu counsel many complex problems of family property disputes, but this "is a divorce,?mod=space&uid=88317," the verdict is still surprised him. Chen Xu lawyer told reporters, first of all, the court shall have jurisdiction to entertain the case is accused Ms. Song seat of the Court, in the year of her husband did not provide any evidence that Ms. Song unaccounted for, the Hebei Hengshui Intermediate People's Court has no jurisdiction. Second, as the exercise of the right to litigate the basic procedural guarantees for the parties, the law strictly defines the method of service of the court. After Hengshui Intermediate People's Court accepted the case, there is no law to take direct delivery, mail service, retention served commissioned service, etc., but on the third day after the announcement of the decision on file a copy of the indictment and court summons served, Miss Song violated the rights litigation, is a serious offense. Moreover,Red Bottom High Heels, only a survey record has not been retained investigator proof of identity, can not prove the authenticity of the survey. This is a low potency investigator's testimony, the court has decided to serve in this way,#comment-177, hasty action. Chan said that in addition to programs outside the law, there are many wrong decisions. Such a matter for the parties significant personal rights and property rights, the Court failed to adequately review the status of litigants, and even party identity cards, marriage certificates and other basic identifying information are not retained in the case file. These problems led to the trial judges should be invalid. The puzzle is, then filed for divorce in Miss Song, which is the Hengshui Intermediate People's Court after the divorce judgment after 10 years, her husband ED Hebei Hengshui Intermediate People's Court for rectification of errors in judgment, and the judgment of the trial did not raise a reasonable punishment couples common property. Thereafter, Hengshui Intermediate People's Court retrial procedure initiated ex officio. Recently, the Haidian court ruling has also served on the Miss Song and lawyers: Hebei Hengshui Intermediate People's Court in view of the divorce judgment, the Court can not accept Ms. Song Haidian litigation. Today, this case ultimately how to identify, deal with, we should see Hengshui Intermediate People's Court for retrial judgment can change the year has been the fact that the divorce. In order to verify the legal basis for argumentation properly resolve the case, Chen Xu invited more than domestic litigation attorney law experts and scholars argues that experts issued submissions that, as a change in the identity of the relationship between the subject of proceedings for divorce proceedings,?mod=space&uid=136535, Hengshui Intermediate People's Court in the trial program jurisdiction exists error, depriving the parties debate the rights without lawful subpoena default judgment and other serious violations, judgment was undoubtedly valid. Experts believe that the verdict to correct the error, retrial procedures shall cassation, the court rejected the man prosecution. Chen Xu lawyer said: "Although this is only a special case together, but it contains an extremely dangerous signal: If the existing marriage can be passed to any lifting of such proceedings, and that the stability of marriage and family, social relations certainty would be seriously damaged. Correcting errors in handling the case,not only to Ms. Song justice, it is the public interest in an account. "Reporter specialized in March 24 letter to the Hengshui Intermediate People want to interview Miss Song reflects verification problem, but immediately after the court received a fax reply, told reporters that all the Hebei Provincial High Court shall be subject to the approval of the job interview. Reporter then call the Hebei Provincial High political propaganda department, the staff said, "should not have this requirement." Finally, the High Court received the reporters letter conveyed to the Hengshui Intermediate People's Court. However, ten days later,Louboutin Daffodile Discount, the reporter has not received any reply. In addition, reporters from the two telephone contact Ms. Song's case is the man to provide the parties seeking their views. One number is not connected to the other by Miss Song husband answered the phone company under its co-workers know the reporter specifically required to verify the contents, but said it could not reply on his behalf, will be conveyed. As of press time reporter, has not yet been a substantive reply. The reporter Sun Ying J001